Legal Opinion

Wahrendorff & Ober v. Whitaker

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 15, 1822PublishedCited by 5 opinions

IN ERROR.

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

Whitaker and others, assignees of Prentice & Bakewell, brought an action of assumpsit, in the Circuit Court of St. Louis county, against the plaintiffs in error, on a promissory note. The defendants plead non-assumpsit, and, by consent, the trial of the issue was submitted to the Court. The bill of exceptions tendered by the defendants, shows that on the trial, the plaintiffs produced in evidence, a joint promissory note to Prentice &. Bakewell, for §5,000, purporting to have been executed by Jacob Reed, for himself, and by Wahrendorff, Oberl and several others, by Jacob Reed, their attorney…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Bank of the State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Pope v. RisleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  3. Elam v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. First Nat. Bank of Elyria v. Equipment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Walker v. St. Louis National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API