Wahrendorff & Ober v. Whitaker
Supreme Court of Missouri
IN ERROR.
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
Whitaker and others, assignees of Prentice & Bakewell, brought an action of assumpsit, in the Circuit Court of St. Louis county, against the plaintiffs in error, on a promissory note. The defendants plead non-assumpsit, and, by consent, the trial of the issue was submitted to the Court. The bill of exceptions tendered by the defendants, shows that on the trial, the plaintiffs produced in evidence, a joint promissory note to Prentice &. Bakewell, for §5,000, purporting to have been executed by Jacob Reed, for himself, and by Wahrendorff, Oberl and several others, by Jacob Reed, their attorney…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Bank of the State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Pope v. RisleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
- Elam v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- First Nat. Bank of Elyria v. Equipment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926
- Walker v. St. Louis National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878