Legal Opinion
Fogle v. Malvern Courts, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 3, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the Fence Law, 29 P.S. § 41, requires an adjoining landowner who does not keep livestock to share the cost of a fence for the benefit of a neighbor. Because we conclude that it does not apply to such a situation, we reverse.
Donald W. Fogle and Charlotte A. Fogle (“the Fogles”) own property located in the town of Frazer, Pennsylvania, which is bordered on three sides by property of Malvern Courts, Inc., Roger Buettner and Joan Bu-ettner (collectively, “the Buettners”). The neighborhood in which the properties are located consists of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phico Insurance v. Presbyterian Medical Services Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Acme Markets, Inc. v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Sweeney v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Choquette v. PerraultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Barber v. MenschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Croner, H. v. Popovich, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Taylor v. Woods Rehabilitation Service, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County2004