Legal Opinion

In Re Detention of Varner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 9, 2000No. 2-99-0322PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rapp

Respondent, Herbert Varner, appeals from a jury verdict finding him to be a sexually violent person and the trial court’s entry of a commitment order pursuant to the Sexually Violent Persons Commitment Act (the Act) (725 ILCS 207/1 et seq. (West 1998)). On appeal, respondent challenges the constitutionality of the Act. Respondent also contends that the trial court erred in ordering him committed to institutional care in a secure facility and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

On August 18, 1998, the State initiated proceedings to commit respondent indefinitely…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. People v. JeffriesIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. TerrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. East St. Louis Federation of Teachers, Local 1220 v. East St. Louis School District No. 189 Financial Oversight PanelIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. People v. TittlebachAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. In Re Detention of VarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Detention of VarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API