Legal Opinion

Daniel R. Denardo v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1992No. 91-35853PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Daniel DeNardo appeals pro se the dismissal of his civil rights action against the Municipality of Anchorage and multifarious other defendants. DeNardo contends that the district court judge, Judge Singleton, erred in failing to recuse himself, and that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint on res judicata grounds after DeNardo failed to appear or show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed. We affirm.

DeNardo contends that Judge Singleton should have recused himself because he is a member of the Alaska Bar Association, a named defendant, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Louis Charles King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Daniel M. Pilla and Jerome Daly v. The American Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. John C. Winston, D.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Louis E. Wolfson and Elkin B. Gerbert, Louis E. WolfsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Karim-Panahi v. U.S. Congress, Senate & House of RepresentativesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2003
  4. DeNardo v. MaassenAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. (PC) Moten v. CisnerosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API