Legal Opinion

Alexis Holyweek Sarei Paul E. Nerau Thomas Tamausi Phillip Miriori Gregory Kopa Methodius Nesiko Aloysius Moses Rapheal Niniku Gabriel Tareasi Linus Takinu, Leo Wuis Michael Akope Benedict Pisi Thomas Kobuko John Tamuasi Norman Mouvo John Osani Ben Korus Namira Kawona Joanne Bosco John Pigolo Magdalene Pigolo, Individually and on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Rio Tinto, Plc Rio Tinto Limited, Alexis Holyweek Sarei Paul E. Nerau Thomas Tamausi Phillip Miriori Gregory Kopa Methodius Nesiko Aloysius Moses Rapheal Niniku Gabriel Tareasi Linus Takinu, Leo Wuis Michael Akope Benedict Pisi Thomas Kobuko John Tamuasi Norman Mouvo John Osani Ben Korus Namira Kawona Joanne Bosco John Pigolo Magdalene Pigolo, Individually and on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Rio Tinto, Plc Rio Tinto Limited

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 12, 2007No. 02-56256PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

487 F.3d 1193

Alexis Holyweek SAREI; Paul E. Nerau; Thomas Tamausi; Phillip Miriori; Gregory Kopa; Methodius Nesiko; Aloysius Moses; Rapheal Niniku; Gabriel Tareasi; Linus Takinu, Leo Wuis; Michael Akope; Benedict Pisi; Thomas Kobuko; John Tamuasi; Norman Mouvo; John Osani; Ben Korus; Namira Kawona; Joanne Bosco; John Pigolo; Magdalene Pigolo, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

RIO TINTO, PLC; Rio Tinto Limited, Defendants-Appellees.

Alexis Holyweek Sarei; Paul E. Nerau; Thomas Tamausi; Phillip Miriori; Gregory Kopa; Methodius…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited104 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Chiquita Brands International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API