Legal Opinion
Scandrett v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 30, 1940No. 241PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission which suspended tariffs and schedules of rail rates on petroleum products filed by petitioners.
Petitioners filed a tariff with the Interstate Commerce Commission on March 10, 1939, known as Supplement No. 5, and on the following day filed an additional tariff, known as Supplement No. 6, which reduced rates on shipments of refined petroleum products in bulk from origin points in Oregon and Washington to points in Oregon and Washington east of the Cascade Mountains, to points in Northern…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Union Pacific Railroad v. BeanOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- New York Central Railroad Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1955
- State of New York v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.