Legal Opinion
Feldschau v. Clatsop County
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
The sole question for consideration is whether the amended complaint alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
In February, 1917, plaintiff entered into a written contract with defendant, on the unit basis, to grub, clear, grade and drain approximately four miles of highway in Clatsop County, at stipulated compensation and in accordance with certain plans and specifications. Time was made the essence of the contract and the work was to be completed not later than July 15, 1917. In what is designated for convenience as the “north portion” of the highway or that part thereof…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Boston Store v. SchleuterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Inland Construction Co. v. City of PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Huszar v. CERTIFIED REALTY COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Northeast Clackamas County Electric Co-Operative, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Northeast Clackamas County Electric Co-Operative, Inc., a Corporation v. Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation, and S. H. Ripp, Doing Business as Ripp Electric Company, S. H. Ripp, Doing Business as Ripp Electric Company v. Northeast Clackamas County Electric Cooperative, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Huszar v. CERTIFIED REALTY COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1975