Legal Opinion
Hy Kom Development Co. v. Manatee County
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided November 16, 1993No. 91-782-CIV-T-17APublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the Defendant’s second motion for summary judgment, filed May 25, 1993, and Plaintiff’s response thereto, filed July 27, 1993. By inference from both Defendant’s motion itself and Plaintiff’s response thereto, it is clear that both parties are relying on Defendant’s first motion for summary judgment and Plaintiffs response to that motion and the same are considered in tandem with the instant motion. The second motion is considered on various grounds as set forth below.
The facts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Esther HAYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, TEXAS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coral Springs Street Systems, Inc. v. City of SunriseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- The Reserve, Ltd. v. Town of Longboat KeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Villas of Lake Jackson, Ltd. v. Leon CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
- Henniger v. Pinellas CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1998