Legal Opinion

Church v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1946No. 2530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

F. E. Church sued Texas and Pacific Motor Transport Company for damages caused by a collision between defendant’s trailer and plaintiff’s automobile. The jury found (1) that defendant failed to have lights burning on the rear of its trailer, and (2) that such failure was negligence but, (3) that such negligence was not a proximate cause of the collision. It also found (4) that defendant’s trailer was not equipped with reflectors, (5) that this was negligence, but (6) not a proximate cause of the collision. The jury found (7) that defendant’s trailer did not have a red…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Monkey Grip Rubber Co. v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HearksTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Blaugrund v. GishTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Waggoman v. Fort Worth Well Machinery & Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Boddeker v. OlschewskeTexas Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. S. & D. Wolf Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. White Cabs v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. White Cabs v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API