Legal Opinion
Fusco v. Medeiros
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided August 6, 1996No. Civil Action 91-0333-LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the objection of respondent Attorney Ina P. Schiff (“Schiff’) to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Timothy M. Boudewyns dated March 11, 1996. In his Report, the magistrate judge recommends that the Court grant the motion of defendants David Medeiros, William Filene’s Sons Company, May Department Stores Company, Marsha Fogarty, Joseph Koechel, and Beverly Shea (collectively, the “Filene’s defendants”) for sanctions and attorneys’ fees pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 as to Schiff, deny…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grant v. John Hancock Mutual, Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Plante v. Fleet National BankDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1997
- Doyle v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025