Legal Opinion
Rothschild v. Gildred
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 4, 2025No. 3:23-cv-02105Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MAYER AMSCHEL ROTHSCHILD, Case No. 23-cv-02105-LJC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 STEPHANIE ANN GILDRED, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendants. 11 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Mayer Amschel Rothschild, pro se, brings this action against Defendants 15 Stephanie Gildred and Lorton Management Corporation (Lorton Management), alleging breach of 16 quiet enjoyment, strict liability, negligence and negligence per se claims. ECF No. 12 (First 17 Amended Complaint) (FAC). Defendants move…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.