Legal Opinion

Gower v. City of Harrisburg

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided June 22, 1922No. 514Published

1Opinion of the Court

Wickeesham, J.,

The jury at the trial of this case having disagreed, the defendant made a motion for judgment in its favor upon the whole record, as provided in the Act of April 20, 1911, P. L. 70.

In passing upon the pending motion, the court must assume the truth of plaintiff’s evidence and consider all favorable inferences that can be drawn therefrom. Under the Act of 1911, judgment can be entered on the entire record only where binding instructions should have been given to the jury: Derrick v. Harwood Electric Co., 268 Pa. 136. The plaintiff was driving his automobile along the northern…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reel v. ElderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  2. Lerner v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Duffy v. York Haven Water & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Derrick v. Harwood Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Lindemann v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API