Legal Opinion

Centennial Oil Co. v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1940No. 9217Published

1Opinion of the Court

109 F.2d 359 (1940)

CENTENNIAL OIL CO.

v.

THOMAS, Collector of Internal Revenue.

No. 9217.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 19, 1940.

Harry C. Weeks and R. B. Cannon, both of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellant.

Lee A. Jackson and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Clyde O. Eastus, U. S. Atty., of Fort Worth, Tex., and John A. Erhard, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Centennial Oil Company, after doing business for two and a half years, had accumulated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murchison's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  2. Baker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Centennial Oil Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  4. Fain v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API