Legal Opinion

Centennial Oil Co. v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1940No. 9217PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Centennial Oil Company, after doing business for two and a half years, had accumulated profits of $42,525 but had declared no dividends. In April, 1937, it surrendered its charter and dissolved, delivering all its assets to Amtex Petroleum Corporation, the owner of all its stock. A surtax on the undivided profits was assessed under the Revenue Act of 1936, 49 Stat. 1648 et seq., and paid to the Collector. Refund not being granted, the officers of the dissolved Corporation in its name sued the Collector of Internal Revenue, asserting that the tax was unlawfully assessed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murchison's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  2. Baker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Fain v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Credit Alliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Fowler Bros. & Cox, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Braicks v. HenricksenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1942
  4. Helvering v. Credit Alliance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Kay Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API