Legal Opinion

Pacific Ship Repair & Fabrication Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker Compensation Programs

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2012No. 11-70292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

The meaning of “permanent” appears, at first blush, to be clear. But just as a museum’s permanent collection does not mean the works will stay in the collection for posterity and a permanent hair wave does not last a lifetime, neither does the term permanent necessarily mean forever. The word permanent takes on meaning in context and, in this case, within a statutory framework.

In the context of maritime employment, we consider an issue of first impression in this circuit: whether a partial “permanent” disability may be re-characterized as “temporary” during a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bertram A. Watson and R. J. Shea, Deputy Commissioner v. Gulf Stevedore CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Wilborn Stevens v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Lockheed Shipbuilding Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. General Construction Company Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp. v. Robert Castro Director, Office of Workers Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Pittsburgh & Conneaut Dock Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ssa Terminals and Homeport Ins v. Robert CarrionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Huntington Ingalls Industries v. Ricky EasonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API