Legal Opinion

Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 2008No. A08-429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAGNUSON, Chief Justice.

Relator Stewart Title Guaranty Company (“Stewart”) challenges the imposition of the Minnesota premium tax, MinmStat. § 60A.15 (1998) and MinmStat. § 2971.05 (2006), on the portion of premiums paid to its agents and never remitted to Stewart. The Minnesota Tax Court held that Stewart owed premium tax on the full premium paid by the customer, including the portion retained by agents. We affirm the decision of the tax court.

Stewart is a Texas-based title insurance company licensed in Minnesota. Stewart sells title insurance policies through a network of agents…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Kmart Corp. v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Piney Ridge Lodge, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sitek v. StrikerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API