Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided February 21, 2006No. 10-05-00050-CRPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELIPE REYNA, Justice.

Charles A. Mitchell pleaded nolo conten-dere to driving while intoxicated (second offense) after the court denied his suppres sion motion. Pursuant to a plea bargain, the court sentenced him to one year in jail, suspended imposition of sentence, and placed him on community supervision for two years. Mitchell contends in two points that the court abused its discretion by denying his suppression motion because: (1) the police officer who stopped his car did not have reasonable suspicion; and (2) this officer’s observations and the stop both occurred outside the city…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Rey Garza v. Roxana Regalado Harrison and Joseph Santellana, Individually and as Respresentative of the Estate of Jonathen Anthony SantellanaTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Bartlett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  3. Arizpe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  4. State v. Purdy, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API