Legal Opinion

United States v. James Milton Cotten and William Lowell Roberts

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1973No. 72-1242PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTIN, District Judge:

The appellants, James Milton Cotten, and William Lowell Roberts, appeal their convictions in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy, and 18 U.S.C. § 641, theft of Government property. The criminality of the conduct which resulted in the convictions is not in doubt. The only questions raised on appeal concern the jurisdiction of the district court.

The expansive nature of the case required that it be submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts. 1 Those facts are important to the questions…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Francisco ToscaninoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Chua Han Mow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. WootenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API