Legal Opinion

Estate of Eckel v. Narciso (In re Narciso)

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 4, 1993No. Civ. No. LRr-M-92-155. Adv. No. 91-1013; Bankruptcy No. 91-10129SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

GEORGE HOWARD, Jr., District Judge.

After careful review of the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law for entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(c) submitted by the bankruptcy court the Court adopts them in their entirety.

Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff against defendants in the amount of $33,952.40.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

*918PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)

MARY D. SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge.

This cause came before the Court upon the trial on the Complaint to Object to Dischargeability of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Michael VAN HORNE. Margaret CASPERS, Appellee, v. Michael VAN HORNE, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Jean Lang v. Texas & Pacific Railway Company and Missouri-Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Bernstein Seawell & Kove v. W.E. Bosarge, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Ilo Vanderboom, Investors Thrift Corporation v. Sam Sexton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  5. Gladden v. BucySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API