Legal Opinion

Kuzmanich v. United Fire & Casualty Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1966PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff is the executor of the estate of Matt Kuzmanich. Defendant insurance company issued a policy of automobile liability insurance to decedent with $10,000 limits for injury to one person. There was no coverage if someone under 25 years of age was operating the vehicle. Decedent and his wife, Mary, made a trip in decedent’s automobile from Portland to Tacoma to attend a picnic. They had with them Matt’s nephew, Marin Kuzmanich who was 21 years of age. While on the trip an accident occurred in the state of Washington in which serious injuries were received by both Matt and Marin. Matt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Radcliffe v. Franklin National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Honeywell v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API