Legal Opinion
Ebbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 8, 2002No. C.A. 01-29 GMSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SLEET, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On January 16, 2001, the plaintiff, Cynthia A. Ebbert (“Ebbert”), filed the above-captioned action against her employer, Da-imlerChrysler Corporation (“Daimler-Chrysler”). In her complaint, she alleges that DaimlerChrysler failed to reasonably accommodate her disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
Presently before the court is Daimler-Chrysler’s motion for summary judgment. Because the court finds that Ebbert’s complaint was untimely filed, it will grant Da-imlerChrysler’s motion.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Seitzinger v. Reading Hosp. and Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Charlene COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cynthia A. Ebbert v. Daimlerchrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Quaak v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler BedrijfsrevisorenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Hunter-Reed v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- APV North America, Inc. v. Sig Simonazzi North America, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002