Bell v. State

Christopher Bell appeals the trial court's judgment adjudicating his guilt and sentencing *744him to five years' confinement.1 Bell contends that the trial court abused its discretion by revoking community supervision and adjudicating him guilty because the State failed to prove he violated a condition of his community supervision. He further contends that the terms of his community supervision unconstitutionally compelled him to waive his constitutional right against self-incrimination. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In 2009, Bell entered an open plea of no contest to the offense of injury to a child, a…