Town of Oakland v. Mercer
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
851 So.2d 266 (2003)
TOWN OF OAKLAND, Appellant,
v.
Michael D. MERCER, Appellee.
No. 5D02-2308.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
August 1, 2003.
J. Edwin Mills, Orlando, for Appellant.
Robert Alfert, Jr., P.A., of Broad and Cassel, Orlando, for Appellee.
SHARP, W., J.
The Town of Oakland appeals from a final summary judgment entered against it in a forfeiture case. We affirm. The record reveals no unresolved issues of material fact, and the appellee, Michael Mercer (Mercer), is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
The record discloses that on November 1, 2000, Oakland, acting…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Canadian Fur Trappers Corp., and Meldisco, a Division of Melville Corp. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Shenango Incorporated v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chuck v. City of Homestead Police Dept.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. ChurchillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Murphy v. FortuneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Cobb v. LangworthyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Floyd v. State ex rel. City of Haines CityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.