Legal Opinion
William B. Tanner Co. v. Waseca-Owatonna Broadcasting
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 22, 1982No. Civ. 2-79-123PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This diversity case is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The parties have stipulated to the relevant facts and agree that the only issué on the merits is the proper interpretation of a disputed term in the contract between the parties.
FACTS
The plaintiff William B. Tanner Co. (Tanner), a Tennessee corporation, is the successor in interest to Pepper Sound Studios, Inc., and Pepper & Tanner, Inc. Tanner provides promotional audio products to radio stations throughout the United States. One of these products is the Tanner Total Sound…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Catalyst Research Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Medtronic, Incorporated v. Catalyst Research CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Midwest Communications, Inc. v. Minnesota Twins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- William B. Tanner Co., Inc. v. Sparta-Tomah Broadcasting Company, Inc., D/B/A Radio WcowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Singer v. WEST PUBLISHING CORP.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Midwest Communications, Inc. v. Minnesota Twins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Bly v. BublitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990