Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Weiss

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

Upon this appeal it appears fitting to review two orders conjunctively, one vacating a warrant of seizure from which plaintiff appeals, and. the other permitting the plaintiff to amend his complaint, from which defendant appeals.

The plaintiff sold certain chattels and fixtures to one Feinberg under a conditional bill of sale for the sum of $3,142.48, payable in installments. Later, defendant assumed Feinberg’s liability and after the sum of $1,938 was paid on account defendant defaulted, *235and plaintiff in May, 1925, began an action “ for the foreclosure of this lien on the aforesaid chattels…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mendelson v. IrvingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Nordone v. F. C. Austin Drainage Excavator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  3. Mathushek & Son Piano Co. v. WeldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. BarnettCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
  3. Fisher v. Stewart Motor Corp.New York City Court · 1928
  4. Hartford Acceptance Corp. v. KirchheimerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938
  5. Marcus v. SherrCity of New York Municipal Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API