Legal Opinion
Centre Insurance v. Blake
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided May 2, 2005No. A2-04-55PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, District Judge.. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (doc. # 15). Plaintiff seeks a declaration that the homeowners policy purchased by Jeffrey Blake does not provide coverage for the injuries sustained by Ashley Escarraz, a minor visiting the rental property. Defendant Blake filed a brief in response, arguing the policy is ambiguous because “reside” is not defined in the policy. Defendant also argues summary judgment should not be granted until additional discovery can be completed. A hearing was held on Thursday, April 7, 2005, during which the Court took…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bernice v. Mansker, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Mansker, Deceased v. Tmg Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Heniser v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Archie D. Roark v. City of Hazen, Arkansas George Orlicek, MayorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co. v. DeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Spring Glen Apartments LLP v. Arch Specialty Ins. Co.United States District Court · 2018
- Davani v. Travelers Personal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
- Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co. v. DeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Roland Pour, Sr. v. Liberty Mutual Pers. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.