Legal Opinion

People v. Kendrick

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 1, 1982No. 81SA446PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

The numerous disciplinary complaints which are the subject of this opinion were brought to obtain redress for flagrant and repeated violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The respondent, F. Owen Kendrick, has already been suspended from the practice of law for three years. People v. Kendrick, Colo., 619 P.2d 65 (1980). Several of the complaints before us were resolved by the Grievance Committee with a recommendation of disbarment. Disbarment is the only proper sanction. We order that the respondent be disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. HarfmannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. People v. RadinskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  3. People v. RadinskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. People v. KluverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. People v. BuggSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BucklesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. People v. FelkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. People v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. WymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. People v. BrooksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API