Legal Opinion
Williams v. Samuel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 28, 1938No. 441; 89, Miscellaneous Docket, 7PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
Plaintiff is a taxpayer of the City of Philadelphia and the owner of two of its bonds. Defendants are (1) the members of the Philadelphia Authority (hereinafter referred to as the Authority), a corporation organized un der the “Municipality Authorities Act” of June 28, 1935, P. L. 463, as amended, and (2) the Mayor and the Director of Public Works of the City of Philadelphia.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to enjoin defendants from carrying out a plan whereby the City of Philadelphia will transfer to the Authority its sewer and water properties and then…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Kelley v. EarleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- McSorley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Lighton v. Abington TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Evans v. West Norriton Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Johnson v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.