Legal Opinion
Pedrozo v. Clinton
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 23, 2009No. Civil Action H-08-3450PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Document No. 7). Having considered the motion, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines the motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Jennifer Pedrozo (“Pedrozo”) and Coane and Associates (“Coane”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this lawsuit against Defendants United States Department of State through its Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton; Janet Napolitano, Secretary, United States…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tomas Menchaca and Wife, Irma Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Barrera-Montenegro v. USA & Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Yu Zhao v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Hartford Insurance Group v. Lou-Con Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Residential Finance Corp. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Khalid v. DHS, USA, & USCISDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Ahmed v. BitterDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
- Anid Infosoft LLC v. BlinkenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023
- Fateh Arslan v. United States Department of State, Marco Rubio, United States Secretary of State; U.S. Embassy in Amman, Jordan, Peter Shea, Ambassador of the U.S. at the U.S. Embassy in Amman, JordanDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.