Reich v. Kirstein
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge,
This is an appeal from a finding entered in favor of appellees who brought suit for rent and breach of covenant.
Our Rule 23(a) provides that the statement of proceedings and evidence brought to this court should include such evidence as is necessary to fully and clearly present the rulings of the trial court in which error is claimed. In the record before us we have no such statement. We have stated time and again that it is the duty of the parties to bring to us a record complete and adequate for the purpose of deciding the questions to be argued, and that this duty…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Voight & McMakin Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Property Redevelopment Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Walker-Thomas Furniture Company v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- United States Merchandise Mart, Inc. v. Commercialaire Corp. of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Douglas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964