Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Century 21 Shows, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 9, 1967No. 42958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Debn, Judge.

Under Code § 105-106 the plaintiff cannot base her action on a tort resulting from the violation of a duty arising only by reason of the defendant’s contract with Coosa Valley Fair Association, Inc., unless she “would have had a right of action for the injury done independently of the contract.” See Stuart v. Berry, 107 Ga. App. 531 (130 SE2d 838). The negligence alleged was that there was a malfunction in the Sky-liner, a device owned and operated by an independent contractor brought in by the defendant under a profit sharing arrangement and subject in certain general aspects of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Dockery Ex Rel. Pullen v. World of Mirth Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Stuart v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Davis v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Georgia Stainless Steel Corp. v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Jenkins v. RaifordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Lewis v. NICHOLAS FINANCIAL, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Cohen v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API