Legal Opinion

Norman E. Anderson the Zeitgeist Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1995No. 93-16114PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:

The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), in an internal manual, has created a means of delaying the sale of seized property beyond what the statute, 26 U.S.C. § 6335, and associated regulations allow. The additional delay is impermissible.

I. FACTS

The IRS assessed Mr. Anderson in 1984 for unpaid income taxes for tax years 1978 and 1979. It did not proceed with the collection efforts at issue in this case until the statute of limitations was about to run, in 1990. On October 24, 1990, five days before the limitations period would have expired on the assessments, the IRS…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Thatcher v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Blossom v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. John J. Kulawy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Surfactants & Specialties, L.P. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Vons Companies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Griswold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Dziura v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Zapara v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API