Legal Opinion

Husman, Inc. v. Triton Coal Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1991No. 90-199PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Husman, Inc. contracted with Appellee Triton Coal Company to remove overburden and topsoil from Triton Coal’s mine site. After Husman began working on the project, it discovered that the material was saturated with water. When the contract was terminated, Triton Coal refused to pay the amount which Husman claimed was attributable to the soggy conditions. Husman filed suit against Triton Coal claiming breach of contract, misrepresentation, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Triton Coal filed a motion for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garner v. HickmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Farr v. LinkWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Baros v. WellsWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Scherer Construction, LLC v. Hedquist Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Triton Coal Co. v. Husman, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Verschoor v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. International Surplus Lines Insurance v. University of Wyoming Research Corp.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API