Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Cavenham Forest Industries

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 2021No. A171184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

153 Argued and submitted September 1, 2020, affirmed June 3, 2021 In the Matter of the Compensation of Jack L. Edwards, Claimant. Jack L. EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. CAVENHAM FOREST INDUSTRIES, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board 1801621, 1801119; A171184

492 P3d 750

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. In that order, the board determined that medical services, including the prescription of antibiotics and the surgical scrubbing of claimant’s prosthetic hip to remove an infection, were not compensable under ORS 656.245(1)(a) because, although…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. SAIF Corp. v. SpragueOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Garcia-Solis v. Farmers Ins. Co. (In re Comp. of Garcia-Solis)Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Long v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. SAIF Corp. v. TonoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. InteliStaf Healthcare v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API