Legal Opinion
Whitaker v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 17, 1995No. 94-7743Published
1Opinion of the Court
514 U.S. 208 (1995)
WHITAKER
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY (MERRILL REESE, INC., REAL PARTY IN INTEREST)
No. 94-7743.
United States Supreme Court.
Decided April 17, 1995.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
2Per curiam
Pro se petitioner Fred Whitaker has filed a petition for writ of certiorari and requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. Pursuant to Rule 39.8, we deny petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.[*] Petitioner is allowed until May 8, 1995, to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38 and to submit his petition in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Whitaker v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re SassowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Day v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Demos v. StorrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.