Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 1966No. 7788PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOISE, Justice.
We are here called upon to determine the relative rights of two insurance companies in connection with a loss covered by policies issued by each.
At all material times the plaintiff, Maryland Casualty Company, hereinafter referred to as “Maryland,” had in force a comprehensive general liability policy insuring R. R. Burke and Sons, hereinafter referred to as “Burke.” The insuring agreement read:
’ “To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured. shall' become legally obligated to pay as damages because of. injury to or destruction of property, including the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Pacific Automobile Ins. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Butte Brewing Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1940
- Southern California Petroleum Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Lucas v. GarrettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- American Employers' Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Factory Mutual Insurance Company v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Trujillo v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Trujillo v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980