Barrett & Caswell v. Pulliam
Supreme Court of Georgia
Eule. Justices and Justice Courts. Code. Officers. Constitutional Law. Laws. Construction. Pleadings. Before Judge Fain. Gordon Superior Court. February Term, 1886. Eeported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
The plaintiffs in error moved a rule against defendant, in the superior court, to show why he should not pay over to plaintiffs the amount of a certain claim which they had placed in defendant’s hands, for collection as a justice of the peace, by reason of his having failed to collect the same. The justice of the peace answered the rule; this answer was traversed by movants; and the jury, on the trial of this issue, found the same in favor of plaintiffs. The court refused to make the rule absolute, and this is assigned as error. The record does not disclose upon what ground…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Thacker v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Alsabrook v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Clark v. HilliardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Tarrant v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.