Legal Opinion

Schmode's, Inc. v. Wilkinson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1985No. 83-762PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Defendants-appellants, Mary and Ronald Wilkinson, doing business as M & R Trucking, challenge the deficiency judgment entered against them, jointly and severally, under Neb. U.C.C. art. 9 (Reissue 1980), in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Schmode’s, Inc., a Nebraska corporation. Among the Wilkinsons’ assignments of error is the failure of the trial court to find that Schmode’s elected to retain the collateral in satisfaction of the Wilkinsons’ obligation. The record sustains that assignment, making it unnecessary that we address the remaining assignments. We reverse, remand, and direct that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tanenbaum v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Nelson v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jones v. MorganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Koperski v. Husker Dodge, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. S. M. Flickinger Co. v. 18 Genesee Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Millican v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cohen v. RainsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Ford v. JordanNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lamp Fair, Inc. v. Pedro v. Perez-Ortiz, Lamp Fair, Inc. v. Pedro v. Perez-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Alamosa National Bank v. San Luis Valley Grain Growers, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API