Legal Opinion

Hipp v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1839PublishedCited by 17 opinions

ERROR to the Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Indictment against an innkeeper, under the statute of 1832, for selling a half pint of whiskey to aman who was intoxicated. Plea, the general issue. Verdict and judgment against the defendant.

There was evidence on the trial tending to show, that the whiskey was sold by an agent of the defendant; and the Court charged the jury, that though the sale was made by a person whom the defendant had left in his tavern as barkeeper, and though it was sold without the defendant’s knowledge, yet that the defendant was as guilty as if the sale had been made by himself.

To this instruction the defendant…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennybaker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Hiler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Boos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. CarmeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Commonwealth v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Fritz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. City of Hammond v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API