Legal Opinion

Milam v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1912No. 1593PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

The appellant was prosecuted and convicted under articles 496 and 500 Penal Code (new), for unlawfully keeping and being concerned in keeping a certain house in which spirituous, vinous and malt liquors were sold and kept for sale, without first having obtained a license to retail such liquors, and his penalty fixed at a fine of $200 and twenty days in'jail.

The appellant has only three bills of exceptions. By the first ho shows that the State introduced Joe Davis and asked him this question: “On the 5th day of August what time in the day was it that 3rou were there? A.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Joliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Basquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Lucio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bradfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Tro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Branch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Tristan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Cruz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API