Folino v. Young
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
Appellants appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing their motion for post-trial relief. In this appeal, we must decide: (1) whether the trial court, in a subsequent civil action, erred by excluding evidence of appellee Young’s *222prior criminal conviction which arose out of the same facts that were the focus of the civil action; and (2) whether ■appellants are entitled to a directed verdict against appellee Young on the issue of negligence.1 For the reasons stated below, the order of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Trial court to enter a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hurtt v. StironeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Kravitz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Mineo v. Eureka Security Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stidham v. Millvale Sportsmen's ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Folino v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Harter v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Duncan v. Honda Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Folino v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.