In re Appeal of Clyde River Hydroelectric Project
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. This appeal arises from the issuance of a water quality certification by the Vermont Water Resources Board for operation of the Clyde River Hydroelectric Project in northern Vermont. The Vermont Natural Resources Council and the Northeast Kingdom Chapter of Trout Unlimited (appellants) contend the Board’s decision: (1) violates provisions of the Vermont Water Quality Standards; (2) is unsupported by the evidence; and (3) contravenes the Public Trust Doctrine and the Common Benefits Clause of the Vermont Constitution. We affirm.
¶ 2. In support of its request to the Federal Energy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pud No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of EcologySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Petition of Town of SherburneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In Re Killington, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Town of Groton v. Agency of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Discharge Permit 3-1199Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In Re Unified Buddhist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- In re Morrisville Hydroelectric Project Water Quality (VT Natural Resources Council, VT Council of Trout Unlimted & Agency of Natural Resources, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- Entergy Nuclear/Vermont Yankee Thermal Discharge Permit AmendmentVermont Superior Court · 2007
- Hinesburg Hannaford Water QualityVermont Superior Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.