People v. Vang
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WISEMAN, J.
The convictions in this case stem from the drive-by shootings at two residences occurring within a very short time of each other. The facts are all too familiar: one of two warring gangs exacts revenge on the other in retaliation for prior gang activity and perceived slights to pride. In the published portion of this opinion we hold that substantial evidence supports eight attempted murder convictions, and attendant true findings of related enhancements. Penal Code section 188’s express malice requirement is met even though defendants could not see all their victims during…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. RobargeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. KongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. CzaharaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. PalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- People v. CanizalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.