Legal Opinion

Da Ponte v. Uzzo

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1926No. 9252PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

This is a damage suit resulting from a collision of automobiles.

The plaintiff alleged that on Sunday, October 30, 1921, at 5:15 p. m., he was driving his five-passenger automobile down Prytania Street and was alone in his car, that on approaching Napoleon Avenue he slowed down to less than five miles an hour in order to avoid children in the act of crossing Prytania Street, and blew his horn, and ascertained that no traffic was coming along on Napoleon Avenue within a distance which, under ordinary circumstances, would interfere with his crossing safely; that he started to cross Napoleon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. Burvant v. WolfeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. McClanahan v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  4. Jones v. Mackay Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. Avegno v. HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Welsch v. LaundryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Crescent Cigar & Tobacco Co. v. MireLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Matsler v. Jones Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Robichaux v. DorionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Rappelet v. Progress Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API