In Re the Will of Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The propounders’ first exception and •assignment of error is to the finding of fact that the caveator tendered to the pro-pounders and their attorney a certified check in the sum of $3,500 within the 90 days as provided in the consent judgment; that the caveator has agreed to accept a deed without warranty to the said lands from the propounders; that the propounders have failed and refused to convey their right, title and interest in the property in controversy -as directed in .said judgment.
The propounder appellants do not contend that the caveator failed to tender the $3,500 within the time…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Redding v. Vogt.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Harper v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Combes v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Bethell v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Home Health & Hospice Care, Inc. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Hemric v. GroceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Ibele v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Brenkworth v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Kassel v. RienthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.