Legal Opinion

In Re the Will of Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1959No. 238PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The propounders’ first exception and •assignment of error is to the finding of fact that the caveator tendered to the pro-pounders and their attorney a certified check in the sum of $3,500 within the 90 days as provided in the consent judgment; that the caveator has agreed to accept a deed without warranty to the said lands from the propounders; that the propounders have failed and refused to convey their right, title and interest in the property in controversy -as directed in .said judgment.

The propounder appellants do not contend that the caveator failed to tender the $3,500 within the time…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Redding v. Vogt.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Harper v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Combes v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Bethell v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Home Health & Hospice Care, Inc. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Hemric v. GroceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Ibele v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Brenkworth v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Kassel v. RienthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API