Legal Opinion
Beaty v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided February 16, 2005No. 09-04-111 CR, 09-04-118 CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Dawn Kay Beaty, was charged under two separate indictments with having obtained controlled substances by forgery, under the provisions of Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.129(a)(5)(A) & (B) (Vernon 2003). 1 Because one of the controlled substances was listed in Schedule II of the Controlled Substances Act, and the other controlled substance was listed in Schedule IV, appellant was facing punishment exposure for both a second degree felony and a third degree felony. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.129(d)(1) & (2) (Vernon 2003); Tex.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Margraves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Moff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Avery, Billie JeanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Gilbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Avery v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
- Avery v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
- Avery v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.