Moff v. State

OPINION

A jury found appellant guilty of theft by a public servant of property that was valued between $500 and $1,500. On appeal, he challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to prove: 1) unlawful appropriation;

2) fair market value of at least $500; and

3) his status as a public servant at the time of the unlawful appropriation. The court of appeals found that the evidence was legally sufficient to show appellant unlawfully appropriated property and that he did so before he resigned as a public servant, but it also held that appellant waived any issue concerning the sufficiency of evidence to…