Legal Opinion

Boston Lodge 264 v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 4, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff union sought an order to compel the defendant Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) to proceed to arbitration on the MBTA’s refusal to make certain cost-of-living adjustments allegedly *820required by a collective bargaining agreement. A judge in the Superior Court ordered the complaint dismissed because there was no collective bargaining agreement in effect. He also concluded that, in any event, the MET A was barred by statute from making the claimed cost-of-living payments. We transferred the union’s appeal here on our own motion. We reverse the judgment. There was an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. School Committee of Danvers v. TymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baltimore County Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 4 v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Old Rochester Regional Teacher's Club v. Old Rochester Regional School District CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Gustafson v. Wachusett Regional School DistrictMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit UnionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API