Legal Opinion
Amelkin v. McClure
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1999No. 96-5942PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilman, J.
SILER, J. (pp. 902-03), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
A number of attorneys and chiropractors, as well as the proposed publisher of a commercial newspaper to be called The Accidental Journal, filed suit to challenge two Kentucky statutes, one restricting the disbursement of accident reports and the other allowing the state custodian of nonexempt public documents to charge commercial users “a reasonable fee” for producing copies of the reports. The district court permanently enjoined the enforcement of both statutes, finding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Edenfield v. FaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amelkin v. McClureCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- North Olmsted Chamber of Commerce v. City of North OlmstedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- Stephen Amelkin v. Ann McClureCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Zillow, Inc. v. Thomas MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Bonnell v. LorenzoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.