Legal Opinion

Stephen Amelkin v. Ann McClure

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 2, 2003No. 02-5079PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

A number of attorneys and chiropractors filed suit to challenge the constitutionality of two Kentucky statutes that restrict their access to accident reports filed with the Department of State Police. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

In 1994, Kentucky amended § 189.635 of its Revised Statutes for the ostensible purpose of protecting the privacy of accident victims. Subsections (6) and (6) of the statute currently provide as follows:(5)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. UmbehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. RaglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. R.S.W.W., Inc., D/B/A Goose Island Brewery v. City of Keego HarborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Keith Bowles v. Harry Russell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Owen Robinson, A/K/A Heavy, United States of America v. Kendall Schuyler, A/K/A Sleepy, United States of America v. William M. ParrosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  4. MS Rentals, LLC v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  5. Zillow, Inc. v. Thomas MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API